by Marie-Lucile Kubacki
New York – The future Blessed did not conquer America solely thanks to the rise of television. His popularity arose from the combination of rigorous theological preparation, a language that touched everyday life, and attention to the real concerns of a vast audience.
When Fulton J. Sheen first appeared on television, on February 12, 1952, the new medium was entering American homes and reshaping family habits and routines. His program, significantly titled “Life Is Worth Living”, was placed in a competitive time slot, up against entertainment shows hosted by Milton Berle and Frank Sinatra.
At first glance, the challenge looked hopelessly uneven: no variety show, no spectacular set, no parade of guests. Just a bishop, a desk, a few books, a statue of the Virgin and Child and, at times, a blackboard. An austerity that was almost provocative.
And yet, as his biographer Thomas Reeves reconstructs in America’s Bishop: The Life and Times of Fulton J. Sheen , within a few weeks, the program became a national phenomenon. The DuMont network received thousands of letters every week; requests to attend the recordings far exceeded the available seats; the broadcast quickly spread to new stations. In 1952 Sheen won the Emmy for outstanding television personality, ahead of already-established stars of American show business. In his acceptance speech he quipped: “I wish to thank my four writers, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John”. The episode cannot be explained, however, solely by the appeal of a naturally “televisual” figure, by his unmistakable voice, by his gaze looking straight into the camera, or by a stage presence honed over decades of preaching. The medium offered an extraordinary opportunity; what made the success lasting was the content.
Simplicity is not simplification, but the fruit of intense work
Sheen did not treat television as a shortcut for making Christianity more “fashionable.” He saw it, rather, as a place where faith could confront the anxieties of modernity intelligently and without fear.
If each of his talks seemed to flow like a river, that was the result of constant work. For the radio broadcasts of the 1930s, he reckoned he spent forty to sixty hours in preparation, Reeves relates; for each television episode, he devoted about thirty. “Being a good speaker,” he explained, “is ten per cent delivery and ninety per cent thinking, study, sweat, and hard work”. He did not read from a script in front of the cameras and did not rely on cue cards: he drew up numerous outlines, revised them and discarded them until the structure of the argument had become second nature to him. From this came the naturalness that many viewers mistook for improvisation.
Before the small screen, there had been radio. Sheen had already made his debut there in 1928, and from 1930 he became a regular voice of the Catholic Hour, the national broadcast promoted in the United States to make Catholic doctrine known and to foster warmer relations among different religious communities. His talks, previously submitted for review by Church authorities, were brief but extremely dense. In 1933 the program was broadcast by 54 NBC stations; about three thousand letters arrived each month, and more than 1.3 million printed copies of the talks had already been distributed. By 1940 the number of stations had grown to 106, and reprints of the talks from the entire series had reached millions of copies.
Sheen’s radio broadcasts, however, offered no escapism or easy “entertainment.” They dealt with the economic crisis, freedom, the dignity of work, war, peace, suffering, the relationship between faith and reason, and the ideologies of his time. In judging fascism and communism, for example, he highlighted a trait they had in common: both tended to absorb the person into the State and gradually strip him of freedom and responsibility. His formulations could be forceful, and bore the marks of the controversies of that historical period, but the common thread was the defense of man as a creature called to God, not as a cog in a political or economic power.
The true protagonist of evangelization is not the star presenter, but the Holy Spirit
This same conviction also shaped his television work.
Life Is Worth Living was not conceived as a confessional lesson for an already-convinced audience. Before every broadcast he asked himself two questions: what was the purpose of the program, and what impression would non-Catholics take away from it. To the first he answered with Paul’s own words: he would proclaim “Christ, and Christ crucified”. As for the second, he invoked a precise cultural responsibility: not to answer caricatures of Catholicism with self-defense, but to show, from within, their depth and reasonableness.
Sheen described his method in these words: “Starting with something that was common to the audience and to me, I would gradually proceed from the known to the unknown or to the moral and Christian philosophy”. For this reason he never sought to force conversions. “Never once was there an attempt at what might be called proselytism,” he observed; it was up to the viewer to recognize whether what he heard corresponded to a lack, a question, or a need present in his own life. The light that might reach a person, he added, was the work of the Spirit, not of Sheen.
His starting point was often surprisingly concrete. He spoke about fatigue and how to deal with it; about boredom at work; about raising teenagers; about loneliness; about character; about freedom; about the anxiety generated by war and the atomic threat. He often opened with an anecdote or a joke, at times deliberately simple, to break down the distance between the bishop and the person sitting at home. Then the tone of the talk would shift: from irony to moral diagnosis, from ordinary experience to the question of man’s destiny, and on to the Christian proposal. It was a way of recognizing that the proclamation of the Gospel meets people who each have their own history and their own questions. To these questions, Sheen did not lower the horizon of faith to a repertoire of quick psychological advice; he took time to listen and showed that the sacraments, prayer, the moral life and grace have everything to do with a full life. His closing formula, “God love you,” coming after he had spoken of conflicts, failures and anxieties, left the viewer contemplating the mercy of God.
A popular audience can be reached using high theological and cultural references
Fulton Sheen had received a thorough formation. A professor of philosophy at the Catholic University of America, also trained at Louvain, he possessed a solid grounding in the Thomist tradition. His thinking was nourished by metaphysics and Christian anthropology, by the doctrine of creation, by the reality of original sin, by personal freedom and by man’s transcendent destiny. In his works and broadcasts, Saint Thomas Aquinas was the key that let him distinguish reason from reductionism, freedom from arbitrariness, and hope from political utopia.
But his culture was not confined to the theological field alone. To reach a plural audience, Sheen knew how to summon a vast constellation of literary, historical, philosophical and scientific references, in a demanding way. His kinship with G. K. Chesterton, which earned him the nickname “the American Chesterton” in England, points to one of the most obvious affinities: a taste for paradox, an apologetics capable of wonder, and the conviction that Christianity does not narrow reality but makes it more intelligible. In his talks there also appeared Plato and Aristotle, Saint Augustine and Dante Alighieri, Blaise Pascal and John Henry Newman, Shakespeare and Charles Dickens, alongside figures of modern thought such as Søren Kierkegaard or Carl Gustav Jung. When he addressed science, technology and atomic war, he did not hesitate to cite or invoke Democritus, Albert Einstein, Leo Szilard, the physicist and astronomer James Jeans, the geneticist Hermann J. Muller, Winston Churchill and even Alexander the Great…
This breadth of references had nothing of the erudite display of “name-dropping.” Sheen used culture as a bridge. He made his listeners understand that the Christian faith could speak with ancient philosophy, with literature, with scientific research and with the political drama of the twentieth century. He started from the idea that a popular audience could be introduced to complex questions if the communicator respected their intelligence and found words, images and passages capable of accompanying them. This was an approach quite the opposite of so-called modern communication, shaped by social media, which relies on slogans and shock phrases and judges the success of an article or a broadcast by the sole criterion of the number of clicks. Indeed, he had no taste for slogans and stock phrases.
Mass communication begins with the encounter with the individual
Sheen’s success also rested on dialogue and encounter. For a long stretch of the Catholic Hour years, the program included questions put by listeners present in the studio and answers given without immediate preparation. Letters arrived with requests for clarification, personal questions, queries about the faith, and appeals for help. In the 1940s, the enormous volume of correspondence required secretaries and dedicated staff; Sheen dictated hundreds of replies every day. To people asking for religious instruction he devoted personal time, often for dozens of hours. In his eyes, mass communication did not erase the encounter with the individual. Quite the opposite: it started from the encounter with the individual, and it was precisely this encounter that reached the masses, thanks to the appeal radiating from the authenticity of these individual encounters — that is, from his media-pastoral experience.
This was rooted in a genuine life of prayer and intimacy with God. Before going on air, Sheen would stop in silence to pray. Then he stepped into the scene with an almost theatrical discipline: controlled timing, sober gestures, studied pauses, careful use of the voice, his gaze turned directly to the lens. For him, the camera was the threshold of a home, and therefore of a conscience. His ability to “speak to everyone” stemmed from his choice never to humiliate anyone with easy formulas or identity-based confrontations. Because he held his mission in high regard, he believed that the Christian communicator does not sell a product, nor work for his own glory, but proclaims Christ — which means being even more demanding with oneself, so as not to hinder the drawing power of the Risen One. The proceeds and visibility of the broadcasts were linked to supporting missionary works through the Society for the Propagation of the Faith.
The television boom made it possible for Fulton Sheen to enter millions of homes. But it was not technology alone that made him heard. His voice found an audience because he did not treat the public as an audience to be won over, nor as a mass to which one need only toss a few easy formulas, but as a collection of people and faces to be taken seriously: capable of thought, marked by genuine questions, open to the truth. In this meeting of intellectual rigor, personal magnetism, lived faith and attentiveness to the anxieties of man lies, perhaps, the deepest reason for his singular media fortune.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.